Skip to content
← All insights
Worldview · Apr 2026

Orchestrating AI Agents Across Departments

What changes when agents have to hand work to each other, not just to a person.

A single agent in a single team is a tool. Two agents handing work across a department line is an operating model — and most of the failure shows up in the handoff, not in the model.

Context gets dropped. Authority is assumed. When something goes wrong, nobody can say which agent acted, under whose sponsor, with which version of the prompt. That is not an intelligence problem. It is an identity and lineage problem.

What to demand before you connect them

  • Each agent has a named owner and a named sponsor — not a shared inbox.
  • Handoffs are explicit: what is transferred, what is withheld, who can reverse it.
  • A verifier sits outside the agent. The worker does not grade its own work.

If you cannot describe the path a task took from intake to action, you do not have a multi-agent system. You have a pile of automations that will be expensive to unwind.

Governance templatev1.3.26

The Agentic AI Risk Management Charter

Engineering ships agents faster than risk teams can write the questions. The charter is the fill-in control framework that closes that gap — identity, proportional authorization, evaluation evidence, and verifier architecture. Compatible with NIST AI RMF 1.0.

Agent identityProportional authorizationEvaluation evidenceThree-layer verifiers
Licenses start at
$297
Team and enterprise tiers to $6,997
Get the charter
Includes the implementation course

Get The Priceless & The Pointless

A newsletter on business success, written in an editorial style. One issue at a time, no filler.